Skip to main content

Hindcasting: How Businesses Can Trust Weather Forecasts

Andy Paterson • October 23rd, 2025.

When a company receives an upcoming weather forecast, they’ll only use it if they feel confident that they can trust it. Hindcasting builds that trust

By examining how forecasted weather and climate models performed against actual historic weather conditions and other benchmark predictions, weather prediction modelers can demonstrate that their models are accurate and outperform others. 

Skepticism is natural, especially when weather forecasts regularly change, different models disagree with each other, and some models have been proven to be wrong. However, conducting hindcasting for weather and climate models can demonstrate that they are reliable and can be trusted.

This blog will examine what hindcasting is, the importance of trusting your forecasts, how hindcasting is performed, and ClimateAi’s hindcasting performance compared to benchmarks. 


What Is Hindcasting and Why Does It Matter

Hindcasting means testing a forecasting model by seeing how well it would have predicted past events. In other words, we run the model on historical data to check if its forecasts match what actually happened. Importantly, each run is done as if we were back in that moment – that is, the model can’t “peek” at any data from the future. This makes hindcasting the most reliable way to test whether a forecasting model works and how well it works.

Hindcasting also allows for a model to be compared against benchmark forecasts, such as from other weather forecasters like NOAA, to determine the model’s skill vs. others. Additionally, hindcasting can be used to determine the accuracy over different lead times for specific weather events. 

Performing hindcasts builds confidence that forecasts using that model will work in the future and will help forecasters hone their models for improved accuracy.

Why Accuracy Matters for Business

Accurate weather forecasts can save lives, assets, and critical infrastructure. Or, if you are an agricultural company, it can ensure you maintain high yields and optimize your logistics and supply chains. 

Research has suggested that forecasts that are 50% more accurate could save 2,200 US lives a year. And for every 1% improvement in the accuracy of forecast, a weather-sensitive company can increase economic output by 2-3%.

To give an example, ClimateAi accurately forecasted Florida’s very high risk of hurricane impacts in 2022 long before Hurricane Ian formed and impacted the state, providing a roofing company with the information they needed to lock in their supply early and increase their sales by $15 million.

How Hindcasting Accuracy Is Measured

To measure hindcast accuracy, forecasts are assessed against actual historical data. We can find the average gap between what was forecasted and what actually happened, and compare that to benchmarks. 

This four-step process, which ClimateAi uses to measure accuracy, helps us build confidence with our users and improve our models. 

Step 1. Compare Forecasts to Reality

We take years of historical forecasts, comparing predicted and observed data (temperature, precipitation, yields, etc.) across many locations and multiple lead times, from 1 day to six months ahead.

Step 2. Measure Error with MAE

The main validation metric we often use to assess accuracy is the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the average gap between what was forecasted and what actually happened, but many other statistical measures of skill are also used at times.

  • Lower MAE = higher accuracy (forecasts are closer to observed outcomes).
  • Improvement is measured as the % reduction in MAE, which can also be compared with baseline forecasts (e.g., NOAA).

That said, using seasonal forecasts effectively requires looking beyond single accuracy scores. We also recommend examining probabilistic measures, since our forecasts describe a range of possible outcomes rather than one deterministic result. Understanding the spread and likelihood of different scenarios is key to making informed, risk-aware decisions when using subseasonal and seasonal forecasts.

Step 3. Aggregate by Timescale

We evaluate accuracy across different time horizons:

  • Short-term: 1–14 days
  • Subseasonal: 3–6 weeks
  • Seasonal: 2–6 months

This ensures ClimateAi’s forecasts perform consistently across both near-term and long-range planning windows.

Step 4. Validate by Event and Region

Beyond large-scale validation, ClimateAi also conducts event-based hindcasts, for example, testing how well models predicted frost or rainfall 3, 7, or 9 days before the event. These targeted evaluations help fine-tune regional performance and support customer-specific adaptation use cases.

ClimateAI’s Accuracy Against Benchmarks

Our platform is built to localize and calibrate forecasts at a granularity of 1km x 1km.

These three examples demonstrate how we consistently outperform benchmarks in temperature forecasts across various geographies and lead times. 

Northern France

A series of three graphs showing ClimateAi's hindcast validation against benchmarks over different lead times in Northern France
ClimateAi hindcast validation across Northern France.

Crops Grown In This Region: Wheat, Barley, Oats, Sugar Beets

In one of Europe’s most climate-sensitive grain growing regions, ClimateAi performed between 19–33% in mean forecast error across short-term (1–14 day), subseasonal (3–6 week), and seasonal (2–6 month) horizons against the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and NOAA’s forecasts.

Result: More reliable temperature projections help farmers and buyers align planting, harvesting, and procurement around shifting seasonal windows.

California, USA

A series of three graphs showing ClimateAi's hindcast validation against benchmarks over different lead times in California.
ClimateAi hindcast validation across California.

Crops Grown in This Region: Pistachios, Almonds, Berries, Grapes, Tomatoes

In the US West, where drought and heat volatility significantly impact agricultural yields and risks, ClimateAi’s 1 km model achieved 18–42% lower error than NOAA and ECMWF forecasts across lead times of 1 day to 6 months.

Result: Our models more accurately capture the long-term temperature and precipitation likelihood critical for irrigation, water management, and planting and harvesting timing.

Mekong Delta, Vietnam

A series of three graphs showing ClimateAi's hindcast validation against benchmarks over different lead times in Vietnam.
ClimateAi hindcast validation across Vietnam’s Mekong Delta.

Crops: Coconut, Sugarcane, Rice, Cassava, Corn

The tropics can be tough regions to predict accurately. Yet ClimateAi delivered 40–62 % improvement over NOAA and ECMWF baselines across all timescales.

Result: Strong skill in monsoon-driven regions enables better timing for input (fertilizers, pesticides), harvesting, and export logistics, saving yields and costs.

How ClimateAi Goes Beyond Accuracy

We are proud of the accuracy of our models, knowing our lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) will give companies more confidence to make time-critical decisions. Having said that, our main value proposition is in tying these forecasts to agricultural, hydrological, and other supply chain or operational data to give insights to avoid losses and drive business value.

Our solution offers immediate visibility into volatility across your entire supply chain, with dynamic decision tools, alerts, and data-sharing functionalities that keep you a step ahead of potential risks. Here is how our accurate models have helped businesses drive returns and exploit opportunities:

  • ClimateAi’s forecast accuracy helped a major commodities firm anticipate weather-driven supply shocks and capture $2–6 million in new profits through smarter hedging and contracting decisions.
  • ClimateAi’s climate modeling and analog tools helped a global agriscience company cut R&D and site-selection costs by 90%, identify tipping points years in advance, and secure future crop supply by locating more resilient production regions.

Now, our recently released AI agent will enable users to query our accurate forecasts and easily interpret them to support data-driven decisions. 

To see how our AI agents enable easier decision-making


Inaccurate weather forecasts are increasingly measured in lives, yield, and assets lost. Hindcasting enables forecasters to demonstrate that their models can be trusted to make informed decisions. 

Accuracy in forecasting underpins the quality of climate adaptation strategies, the potential ROI of those adaptations, and how resilient a company is. 

To see how ClimateAi’s models can help you build a resilient business model and how we perform for your crop or region. Get a demo.

Hindcasting FAQs

Hindcasting, also known as ‘retrospective forecasting,’ is the process of running a forecast model backward over historical data to see how accurately it predicted what actually happened. It’s a standard validation method used to prove a model’s reliability to both build confidence and improve modeling.

Accurate forecasts drive better decisions, from when to plant or irrigate, to when to hedge or contract commodities. Research indicates that a 1% improvement in forecast accuracy can lead to a 2–3% increase in output in weather-sensitive industries. Hindcasting ensures those forecasts are proven.

ClimateAi evaluates accuracy using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) — the average difference between forecasted and observed outcomes. The lower the MAE, the more accurate the forecast. We compare our model’s MAE against benchmarks like NOAA and ECMWF, and consistently show 15–60% improvements depending on region and timescale.

ClimateAi uses an ML-enhanced ensemble approach that combines multiple model outputs, corrects for bias, and fine-tunes to regional microclimates at 1 km × 1 km resolution. This produces significantly better accuracy for specific crops, regions, and planning windows.

Yes. Our hindcast validation directly links forecast accuracy to financial outcomes:

  • A roofing company used ClimateAi’s model to correctly forecast a hurricane, enabling them to lock in supply and increase sales by $15 million.
  • A major commodities firm used ClimateAi forecasts to anticipate weather-driven supply shocks — earning $2–6 million through smarter hedging and contracting.
  • A global agriscience company used our modeling and analog tools to cut R&D and site-selection costs by 90%, identify climate tipping points years in advance, and secure future crop supply by relocating to more resilient regions.

Start small with pilot projects, involve finance early, and utilize executive-ready reporting that includes hard-dollar metrics and before-and-after dashboards.

You can request a custom hindcast validation demo through our platform. This shows how your specific crop or geography performs relative to historical weather and NOAA or ECMWF benchmarks.

Ready to find out what risk-intelligence can do for your bottom line?

Talk to Us